RSample.com

Politics and Theology from Reuel K. Sample

Browsing Posts published by reuelsample

Prom DressA high school senior was denied access to her prom because she was wearing a dress with the “Stars and Bars” of the Confederacy. (The Tennessean) This controversy has awakened cries of Freedom of Speech, racism and heritage respect. For me, it is pure lunacy in action.

While East Tennessee was a reluctant part of the Confederacy (it actually tried to secede from the rebel states) – it is actually still very much a part of the debate over the appropriateness of displaying that flag. There are some who want to walk away from that history all together. As modern day Germans do not talk about Hitler, the issue of slavery and rebellion is dark and hurtful spot for many – a spot that cannot be erased but at least not brought to mind. For others, the flag represents the heritage of a proud south. Yet others see it as the ultimate testament to free speech and state’s rights.

This incident – though – is really about none of those.

It seems that Texanna Edwards was told by the Prom Advisor some two months before the dance that the dress would be problematic. She had it designed and wore it anyway. She had to have known about some of the race problems – both locally and nationally. She forged on ahead. She was told to talk to administration and see what could be done. She didn’t. Ms. Edwards was given a chance – when denied entrance to the prom – to go home and change and come back. She opted out.

What angers me is that we constantly hear about “Student Rights.” Students – children – do not have any rights because they lack the ability to fight and protect those rights. Adults have the legal and moral responsibility to protect children, to encourage them to grow and think, to provide loving and nurturing homes. But adults do so because that is the RIGHT thing to do – not because we are trying to protect their rights. Possession and exercise of rights also indicates that the converse is also in play – the responsibility for consequences for exercising those rights. For example – I have the freedom to yell “Fire” in a crowded theater. I would also be prosecuted – and rightly so – as a result of my irresponsible use of that right.

Ms. Edwards, it seems, wants to have her Constitutional cake and eat it too. On one hand, she is 18 – and therefore has reached the age of majority and can claim certain rights as an adult. If that is the case, then she needs to understand that the result of her actions – of not consulting with school officials and being proactive and mature in her plans – is that she is out one prom and about $500. On the other hand, proms are for children – high schoolers. As children – they are expected to obey the directions of adults. She did not – so as a child her punishment is not to go to the dance – and be out $500. Ms. Edwards now has to decide – is she a child or an adult?

Either way – she needs to get a new dress.

National Defense Authorization ActThe President signed into law on New Year’s Eve the National Defense Authorization Act.  Liberals are not happy, Muslims are not happy, the ACLU is not happy.

All this probably means the country is going to be safe.

At issue is the ability of the U.S. government to allow indefinite detention of some prisoners and mandating military custody for others. The law expressly excludes American citizens from being held in such a manner.   Americans – as Americans should – are protected by guaranteed rights under the Constitution.  This law applies only to non-Americans out to destroy our country.  In other words, we are treating sworn enemies of America as enemies.

These people are not criminals to be tried in court.  They are not political activists who need a podium.  They are not refugees seeking a new life.  They are non-uniformed enemy combatants.   Since terrorists do not fall under even the broadest interpretations of Article 4 of the Geneva Conventions – the United States is going above and beyond even the spirit of the law by treating them as humanely as we do.  We could just as easily – and justifiably – shoot these terrorists as spies.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations – CAIR – predictably condemned the passage: “This ill-conceived and un-American legislation will forever be seen as a stain on our nation’s history — one that will ultimately be viewed with embarrassment and shame.” (MarketWatch)  Since most of the detainees in question are Muslim – as are most of the terrorists in the world – I guess I can see why CAIR feels like it needs to take a stand.  But since the Council is also suspected by the FBI as being in bed with Hamas and other terror groups – I could not really care less what CAIR says.

The Libertarian Party also opposes this law: “Now, in the latest National Defense Authorization Act, Congress is trying to give the president power to imprison Americans indefinitely, without charges or respect for habeas corpus, if he claims they are terrorists.”  (Libertarian Party)  Yet, article 1021 expressly states that nothing in this law pertains to “the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.” (NDAA)  The Libertarian Party, though, believes that isolationism is the best way to combat terrorism:

The Libertarian Party opposes terrorism. We also believe our government should stop taking actions that provoke terrorism. We want to end military involvement in Iraq, Afghanistan, and many other countries…(Libertarian Party)

Unrealistic at best, stupid at worst.

But what is good is that this is an election year.  In any other year, President Obama would have caved to CAIR, the ACLU, Human Rights Watch, and others.  (I doubt very much he cares about the Libertarians)  In election years, however, foreign policy is big – and the Democrats are perceived as being very bad at foreign policy.  (Which they are – but it only counts every 4 years)   Whatever his reasons, the President did the right thing.

Yes – we must maintain the integrity of the United States by treating all detainees as humanely as possible.  Yes – we must be transparent in our detention of these prisoners.  And yes – American terrorists must never be stripped of their rights as citizens.

But never should we lose sight of the fact that terrorists don’t care about this – or any – law of this country.  They have no regard for rights, life, innocence, or freedom.  They think nothing of strapping bombs to themselves, their wives, or their children.  They carry out their holy war in the most unholy of manners.  They have sacrificed their humanity for a cause only they believe in.

Let’s keep them locked up.

Speaker of the House Boehner once again caved in to political pressure to strike a deal with the Senate about the payroll tax. (Fox News)

Reaction is predictable.  Senator Reid is declaring a victory.  House conservatives are calling for Boehner to step down.  President Obama is making speeches.   And once again the American people are completely duped by bad politics.

It truly is about politics.  Neither side wants to be seen as the bad guy who raises taxes.  Both sides want to be champions of the middle class.  Republicans and Democrats know that an election is coming up – and that maneuvering of this type is essential to win (or hold) seats.

So Speaker Boehner caved.  Good politics demanded it.

But good politics is never a substitute for bad policy.  And this two-month extension is truly that – bad policy.  Businesses do not run on 60 day cycles. They cannot retool for two months, and then retool again as policy changes.   Small business does not want good policy for short term.  Small business wants good policy that is measured in years, not months.

Boehner did not have much of a choice.  Once again he was laid wide open by Senate Republicans who seek always to compromise, or at the very least, want all these battles to be fought on the House floor.  He is also compromised by the GOP’s continued inability to properly get their message out – and get it out clearly.  The Democrats are the masters of the Sound Bite – and the Speaker knows it.  So – like the Super Committee on Tax Cuts – good politics leads to bad policy.

Come next November, lets combine good politics AND good policy – shall we?


Today I explained the merits of the National Retail Sales Tax (The Fair Tax) to yet  another class of business math students.  The response I get, though,  is always the same:  “Why haven’t we done this yet?”

It is a powerful message that conservatives need to heed.

The students that I am talking to are non-traditional students. They do not come from an academic background – but a working class one. For many, this associate’s level degree will be the first college degree in their family. They are working hard to turn their life around, to get training for a career, and to change the course of their family.

And overwhelmingly they vote Democrat.

These are the type of folks that the Dems like – working class, not well educated, often union-oriented. Many of them are black, overwhelmingly female, and some have criminal records. These students are Southern Democrats – and are very proud of both parts of that title.

And they like the Fair Tax.

Because the chapter I am covering talks about payroll taxes, I am free to use the opportunity to discuss alternatives to the income tax. I go through the reasoning behind the fair tax, the numbers that come up when we eliminate the income tax, and the economic boom that would impact both individual and country. And overwhelmingly – they get it!

The Fair Tax – like other Conservative issues – has been represented as something hard to understand, hard to sell, hard to teach. Indeed the conservative movement itself has been characterized as something only geared for upper class, educated, white men.

But my students are the exact opposite of all these assumptions. And they are mad as Hell that such a simple answer to the economic woes of this country is being blocked by lobbyists and members of both parties. They cannot understand why we go deeper into debt while borrowing more to pay for programs that clearly do not work. They are sick and tired of politicians who mortgage the future of this country because they can buy votes from those who only want to suck at the teat of the American dream and not contribute to it.

The message is clear. Conservatives – the folks that we have overlooked are more ready than ever to hear our message. Liberals – your base is no longer following your lead, and are not buying the “government knows best” answer anymore.

PutinVladimir Putin – not one of my favorite people – on Monday stated that America is a parasite on the world economy.  (Fox News).

He went on to say:

The country is living in debt. It is not living within its means, shifting the weight of responsibility on other countries and in a way acting as a parasite…

He is right.

The recent bill to handle the debt ceiling is a great example.  The government refuses to reign in spending.  The people refuse to have tax increases to confiscatory levels.  So, in a move that is both parasitical and irresponsibile - we voted to go ahead and borrow more money.

Neither individuals nor corporations are free to do what our government – which relies on these entities – has freed itself to undertake.  I cannot continually borrow money to meet bills that I have no intent of getting under control.  Businesses must answer to stock holders as to why income does not cover outlay. 

Our government, though,  can increase spending AND ask for more money on loan – all at the same time.  At least for now.

 I am saddened that our nation – once so fiercely proud of our independence – is now in debt to a whole host nations.  I am saddened that our politicians cannot see past their next election cycle.  I cringe at the thought that many of these irresponsible politicians are going to be re-elected because they successfully “fought to protect” any federal spending targeted at their constituents.

And I am livid that it takes a brutal and immoral man like Putin to point it out.